#War of rights forums free

After the Glorious Revolution, however, the 1689 Declaration of Rights recognized that вЂњit is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning is illegal.вЂќ Wary that open airing of grievances would spark popular dissent, Parliament at times punished particularly severe complaints and prohibited petitions bearing more than 20 signatures. With its overlapping executive, judicial and legislative functions, Parliament referred most of these to internal committees, appointed auditors or deferred to royal counselors.

These early petitions usually stated personal grievances and individual requests for relief. From this contract grew the tradition allowing British subjects to submit their grievances to the kingвЂ™s council and, with the ascendancy of Parliament, to the House of Commons. In 1215, King John signed the Magna Carta, which recognized the right of the barons to petition the crown. As the early House and Senate debated вЂњthe peopleвЂ™s right to instruct their Representatives,вЂќ their deliberations echoed the momentous accommodation between King John and his barons at Runnymede more than 500 years earlier. The original draft of the First Amendment contained only assembly and petition, not speech, press or religion. In building a new democracy, the Founders avoided the kingвЂ™s mistake by guaranteeing political receptiveness to public concerns. King George IIIвЂ™s crowning wrong, in the end, was his indifference: Those who revolted felt they had no other recourse.

#War of rights forums free

A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.вЂќ вЂњIn every state of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. On July 4, 1776, the countryвЂ™s Founders adopted a famous statement of principles and list of grievances, declaring that: While citizens and litigants invoke the First Amendment to secure Internet freedom, undisturbed worship, or a robust press, petitioning rights donвЂ™t seem to attract much controversy any more. Yet the petition clause seems to strike most courts and legal commentators as obvious and uninteresting. The right to petition allows citizens to focus government attention on unresolved ills provide information to elected leaders about unpopular policies expose misconduct, waste, corruption, and incompetence and vent popular frustrations without endangering the public order. Petition is the right to ask government at any level to right a wrong or correct a problem.ДЄlthough a petition is only as meaningful as its response, the petitioning right allows blocs of public interests to form, harnessing voting power in ways that effect change. The petition clause concludes the First AmendmentвЂ™s ringing enumeration of expressive rights and, in many ways, supports them all. вЂњCongress shall make no law вЂ¦ abridging вЂ¦ the right of the people вЂ¦ to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.вЂќ

The right of petition is expressly set out in the First Amendment: That means that what you are doing could be considered illegal under both local and international law This form of medical discrimination is directly addressed and could be defined as coercion under the Nuremberg code, as a high crime against humanity, which could lead to personal criminal liabilities for individuals, even when acting on behalf of a seperate entity.Freedom of Petition Overview Specific Topics: Right to sue SLAPP suits THE PENALTY FOR THESE CRIMES IS DEATHвЂ‹ A warning to all those entities public and private and their members, who feel that they may be acting within the bounds of our civil and criminal laws and medical statutes by requiring a medical procedure such as the injection of experimental emergency use vaccines, or making them requisite for the purchase of goods and or services, or for employment, or for any other reason, you may want to consult with your attorneys on this before doing so, as this could be considered coercion under both our medical statutes and the Nuremberg code. 3 VIDEOS PRESENTATION = ALL PARTICIPANTS FROM ALL VACCINES EXPERIMENTS ARE IN VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS NUREMBERG CODES OF THE CRIMES AGAINTS HUMANITY = ARTICLE LINK BELOW =